-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
move proof types to Annex F #489
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
||
1. Provide proof of control alongside key material. | ||
1. Provide only proof of control without the key material. | ||
For Cryptographic Key Binding, the Client has different options to provide Cryptographic Key Binding material for a requested Credential within a proof of a certain proof type. A proof type may provide the cryptographic public key(s) either with corresponding proof(s) of possession or with key attestations. Proof types are defined in (#proof-types). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For Cryptographic Key Binding, the Client has different options to provide Cryptographic Key Binding material for a requested Credential within a proof of a certain proof type. A proof type may provide the cryptographic public key(s) either with corresponding proof(s) of possession or with key attestations. Proof types are defined in (#proof-types). | |
For Cryptographic Key Binding, the Client has different options to provide Cryptographic Key Binding material for a requested Credential within a proof of a certain proof type. A proof type may provide the cryptographic public key(s) either with corresponding proof(s) of possession of the private key or attestation. Proof types are defined in (#proof-types). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"...or with key attestation" would be clearer to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't feel too strongly, happy with the original text, "proof of possession" alone is probably good enough without my addition.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor suggestion, otherwise looks good to me.
This should wait until #495 is merged |
closes #304
supersedes #458 (which had some merge conflicts as PR is already 3 months old)
I fixed some text in Section 8.1, moved the annex from C to F and added a short intro text.