Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Used fixed name for dummy ipv6 interface to avoid length issue #1447

Merged

Conversation

bfournie
Copy link
Contributor

@bfournie bfournie commented Sep 7, 2022

As tracked in #1124, interface creation can fail if the name exceeds 15 characters. Ensure that for long cluster name the dummy interface that is created will not exceed this length by using a fixed name.

As tracked in openshift-metal3#1124,
interface creation can fail if the name exceeds 15 characters. Ensure that
for long cluster name the dummy interface that is created will not exceed
this lenght by using a fixed name.
@bfournie bfournie changed the title Handle error when creating dummy interface Used fixed name for dummy ipv6 interface to avoid length issue Sep 7, 2022
@derekhiggins
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 8, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: derekhiggins

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 8, 2022
@dtantsur
Copy link
Member

dtantsur commented Sep 9, 2022

/lgtm

I wonder if we should delete the old interface for people who reuse their box.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 9, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3a1289b into openshift-metal3:master Sep 9, 2022
@bfournie
Copy link
Contributor Author

/lgtm

I wonder if we should delete the old interface for people who reuse their box.

The old interface won't get created because of the name length problem,

@dtantsur
Copy link
Member

The old interface won't get created because of the name length problem

I mean, on systems that do not have the length issue.

@bfournie bfournie deleted the handle-ip-error branch September 13, 2022 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants