-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
NE-2090: adding one GIE automation test #30189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@rhamini3: This pull request references NE-2090 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
/test all |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rhamini3 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you able run all case together to check whether they are passing together?
o.Expect(errCheck).NotTo(o.HaveOccurred(), "GatewayClass %q was not installed and accepted", gatewayClassName) | ||
|
||
g.By("Install the GIE CRD") | ||
err := oc.AsAdmin().Run("create").Args("-f", infPoolCRD).Execute() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't we need a defer like function for removing the GIE CRD ?
may be in the g.AfterAll(func().
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@melvinjoseph86 removing the inference Pool CRD is a part of the test process, I do it below to confirm that the istio no longer has the env variable
yes, no problem |
Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. New Test Risks for sha: c32e8d3
New tests seen in this PR at sha: c32e8d3
|
@rhamini3: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: a82a19a
Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. New tests seen in this PR at sha: a82a19a
|
NE QE team decided to create one GIE test to check for GIE enablement with the presence of an env variable
CC @lihongan @melvinjoseph86 @ShudiLi PTAL
test result: