Consolidate config generation #527
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bshephar The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
bshephar
force-pushed
the
consolidate-config
branch
from
b944f24 to
99318b1
Compare
|
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/7e25d9d0093743eca3f9893b589e88f4 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 50m 19s |
We currently render config-data for each of the controllers. This is largely unnecessary, we can use a single heat-config-data for each of the deployments. If absolutely required, we could allow for it to differ for the heat-engine deployment. Signed-off-by: Brendan Shephard <[email protected]>
bshephar
force-pushed
the
consolidate-config
branch
from
99318b1 to
d2bad44
Compare
|
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/1fadd9ea2b3c4c99aa7485433a38c68f ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 47m 53s |
|
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
We currently render config-data for each of the controllers. This is largely unnecessary, we can use a single heat-config-data for each of the deployments. If absolutely required, we could allow for it to differ for the heat-engine deployment.