Skip to content

chore(main): release service 0.4.27 #1670

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

chore(main): release service 0.4.27 #1670

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

opentdf-automation[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot commented Oct 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

0.4.27 (2024-11-14)

Features

  • authz: JWT ERS that just returns claims (#1630) (316b5be)
  • authz: Remove org-admin role, move privileges to admin role (#1740) (ae931d0)
  • backend migration to connect-rpc (#1733) (d10ba3c)
  • connectrpc realip interceptor (#1728) (292fca0)
  • docs: add policy ADR for LIST limit and pagination (#1557) (069f939)
  • move from fasthttp in-memory listener to memhttp implementation (#1709) (70518ff)
  • policy: 1603 policy improve upsertattrfqn (#1679) (cd17a44)
  • policy: 1651 move GetAttributesByValueFqns RPC request validation to protovalidate (#1657) (c7d6b15)
  • policy: 1659 spike on transactions support (#1678) (a6fea11)
  • policy: add optional name field to registered KASes in policy (#1636) (f1382c1)
  • policy: add optional name field to registered KASes in policy (#1641) (b277ab4)
  • policy: limit/offset throughout LIST protos/gencode (#1668) (7de6cce)
  • policy: SPIKE transactions support (#1663) (866f4f3)
  • policy: subject condition sets prune protos/gencode (#1687) (a627e02)
  • policy: subject condition sets prune service/db (#1688) (3cdd1b2), closes #1178
  • update service registry in preperation for connectrpc migration (#1715) (ce289a4)

Bug Fixes

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2024 22:38
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--service branch 3 times, most recently from 2faadf5 to 7dbaac1 Compare October 31, 2024 18:28
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--service branch from 7dbaac1 to fba2a58 Compare November 4, 2024 17:55
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2024 17:55
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--service branch 21 times, most recently from c69ad01 to de8922d Compare November 7, 2024 15:49
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--service branch 2 times, most recently from a648ea2 to 46aa5cb Compare November 13, 2024 18:40
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--service branch 4 times, most recently from e421b06 to 8c0b5e8 Compare November 13, 2024 21:41
@opentdf-automation opentdf-automation bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--service branch from 8c0b5e8 to a42701c Compare November 14, 2024 14:18
@strantalis strantalis added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 14, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 94a38fb Nov 14, 2024
21 checks passed
@strantalis strantalis deleted the release-please--branches--main--components--service branch November 14, 2024 16:16
@opentdf-automation
Copy link
Contributor Author

🤖 Created releases:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@strantalis strantalis strantalis approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
autorelease: tagged
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Policy: detached SubjectConditionSets should be able to be pruned
1 participant
@strantalis