Remove fare service from Graph

[leonardehrenfried]

Summary

This removes the fare service from the Graph instance and lets Dagger manage it instead.

Unit tests

A few unit tests had to be adjusted.

Bumping the serialization version id

✔️

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 45.45455% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.16%. Comparing base (a5a328b) to head (177f47b).
Report is 34 commits behind head on dev-2.x.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ner/standalone/configure/ConstructApplication.java	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...pentripplanner/ext/fares/configure/FareModule.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...n/java/org/opentripplanner/standalone/OTPMain.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...pplanner/standalone/configure/LoadApplication.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...entripplanner/apis/gtfs/GraphQLRequestContext.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...rg/opentripplanner/graph_builder/GraphBuilder.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...andalone/configure/ConstructApplicationModule.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             dev-2.x    #6292      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      71.19%   71.16%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity     18465    18454      -11     
=============================================
  Files           2026     2027       +1     
  Lines          76289    76296       +7     
  Branches        7807     7807              
=============================================
- Hits           54312    54296      -16     
- Misses         19218    19238      +20     
- Partials        2759     2762       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[leonardehrenfried]

@tkalvas @habrahamsson-skanetrafiken I've rebased and reworked this PR and it's now ready for review again.

[optionsome]

There are conflicts in this pr. Who was the second reviewer @habrahamsson-skanetrafiken or @vpaturet ?

[leonardehrenfried]

I resolved the conflicts and this is ready for review again.

I believe that Henrik requested that @vpaturet reviews this.

[leonardehrenfried]

@tkalvas Regrettably I had to resolve some merge conflicts so your review is required again.