Skip to content

Conversation

@commodo
Copy link
Contributor

@commodo commodo commented Dec 7, 2024

Maintainer: me
Compile tested: n/a
Run tested: n/a


This backport is mostly to align with master, since the version in 24.10 is slightly ahead.


Fixes:
#23648 (comment)

As weird as this sounds, the only different between the current version (2.9.0.post0) and 2.9.0 is the pinning of setuptools_scm to < 8. See: https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/releases/tag/2.9.0.post0

Also, the APK build doesn't seem to like the 'post0' suffix.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 40cfff8)

@commodo commodo added the OpenWrt 24.10 Issue/PR on branch 24.10 label Dec 7, 2024
Fixes:
  openwrt#23648 (comment)

As weird as this sounds, the only different between the current version
(2.9.0.post0) and 2.9.0 is the pinning of `setuptools_scm` to `< 8`.
See:  https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/releases/tag/2.9.0.post0

Also, the APK build doesn't seem to like the 'post0' suffix.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 40cfff8)
@commodo commodo force-pushed the python-dateutil-fix1-24.10 branch from 50a7e44 to 587f174 Compare December 7, 2024 05:34
@hnyman hnyman merged commit 0396341 into openwrt:openwrt-24.10 Dec 8, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
@commodo commodo deleted the python-dateutil-fix1-24.10 branch December 9, 2024 08:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

OpenWrt 24.10 Issue/PR on branch 24.10

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants