Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve: replace jenvtest with kube-api-test from fabric8 client #2497

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 15, 2024

Conversation

csviri
Copy link
Collaborator

@csviri csviri commented Aug 14, 2024

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from adam-sandor and metacosm August 14, 2024 12:45
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 14, 2024
@csviri csviri changed the base branch from main to next August 14, 2024 12:45
@csviri csviri changed the title use kube api test improve: replace jenvtest with kube-api-test from fabric8 client Aug 14, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 14, 2024
@@ -85,9 +85,8 @@
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>io.javaoperatorsdk</groupId>
<artifactId>jenvtest</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't it still use the test scope?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess that is inherited from dependency management

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15221299/dependencymanagement-and-scope seems to indicate that putting scopes in dependencyManagement is a bad practice…

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, ok np, will move it

csviri and others added 7 commits August 15, 2024 11:18
@csviri csviri force-pushed the use-kube-api-test branch from 23ed3b7 to 9492575 Compare August 15, 2024 09:21
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
@csviri csviri merged commit e364774 into next Aug 15, 2024
20 checks passed
@csviri csviri deleted the use-kube-api-test branch August 15, 2024 09:26
metacosm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
metacosm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
metacosm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
metacosm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
metacosm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
metacosm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
metacosm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
csviri added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants