Skip to content

Conversation

@supersonicbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Fixes bump of swift syntax.

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.

Minimal checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have added DocC code-level documentation for any public interfaces exported by the package
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.27%. Comparing base (733e34c) to head (3942333).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #31   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.27%   87.27%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines         495      495           
=======================================
  Hits          432      432           
  Misses         63       63           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 733e34c...3942333. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@supersonicbyte supersonicbyte merged commit 73f819b into main Sep 30, 2025
12 checks passed
@supersonicbyte supersonicbyte deleted the fix/swift-syntax-dependency branch September 30, 2025 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants