[FTheoryTools] Add support for all vertical, well-quantized G4s that do not break the non-Abelian gauge group

[HereAround]

cc @apturner @emikelsons

[lgoettgens]

Some random comments with small improvements to allocation reduction and type stability. There are many very similar opportunities to be improved that should be tackled at some point

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 78.49462% with 40 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.40%. Comparing base (43499a7) to head (d2c7128).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...al/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/special_attributes.jl	75.15%	39 Missing ⚠️
...rimental/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/constructors.jl	80.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #4446    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   84.39%   84.40%            
========================================
  Files         663      668     +5     
  Lines       87938    88493   +555     
========================================
+ Hits        74214    74691   +477     
- Misses      13724    13802    +78     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...perimental/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/attributes.jl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...perimental/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/properties.jl	98.46% <100.00%> (+0.63%)	⬆️
...tal/FTheoryTools/src/HypersurfaceModels/methods.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
experimental/FTheoryTools/src/auxiliary.jl	76.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...rimental/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/constructors.jl	57.69% <80.00%> (+2.37%)	⬆️
...al/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/special_attributes.jl	78.12% <75.15%> (-2.88%)	⬇️

... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

[HereAround]

Some random comments with small improvements to allocation reduction and type stability. There are many very similar opportunities to be improved that should be tackled at some point

Thank you. I have taken your points into account. Ideally, 4914e16 should improve the code efficiency. But I am certain that there is a LOT more that could be done - in a separate PR.

[HereAround]

With that being said @apturner and @emikelsons , this PR should be ready for review.

[HereAround]

I just took the liberty to push changes that hopefully will reduce the number of allocations in the computation of singular loci. A bit more tricky - postponed to the next PR.