BE-586 | OrderBookClient use slices.Split for pagination #535
Conversation
Cleans up OrderBookClient by reusing slices.Split instead of duplicating splitting slices into chunks logic in some of the methods.
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve the addition of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
domain/orderbook/grpcclient/orderbook_grpc_client.go (1)
120-121: Approved: Good refactoring, with a minor suggestionThe use of
slices.Splithere improves code readability and consistency, aligning well with the PR objectives.Consider updating the error message to use the
chunkvariable for consistency with theFetchTickUnrealizedCancelsmethod:- return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to fetch ticks for pool %s: %w", contractAddress, err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to fetch ticks %v for pool %s: %w", chunk, contractAddress, err)This change would provide more specific error information and maintain consistency across similar methods.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- domain/orderbook/grpcclient/orderbook_grpc_client.go (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
domain/orderbook/grpcclient/orderbook_grpc_client.go (3)
9-9: LGTM: New import added correctlyThe new import for the
slicespackage is correctly placed and necessary for the refactored methods.
92-95: Great refactoring: Improved readability and consistencyThe use of
slices.Splitsimplifies the chunking logic, making the code more readable and consistent with the PR objectives. The error handling has been appropriately updated to reflect the new variable name.
Line range hint
1-134: Summary: Successful refactoring with improved code qualityThe changes in this file successfully achieve the PR objective of reusing the
slices.Splitfunction for pagination. This refactoring has:
- Eliminated duplication of chunking logic in
FetchTickUnrealizedCancelsandFetchTicksmethods.- Improved code readability and maintainability.
- Maintained existing functionality and error handling.
The use of
slices.Splithas simplified the code without introducing any apparent issues. Overall, this is a positive change that enhances the quality of theOrderBookClientimplementation.
Cleans up OrderBookClient by reusing slices.Split instead of duplicating splitting slices into chunks logic in some of the methods.
Summary by CodeRabbit
FetchTickUnrealizedCancelsandFetchTicksmethods for improved readability and maintainability.slicespackage.