Skip to content

BE-691 | Implement handleCandidateRoutesInGivenOut API #617

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: v28.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

deividaspetraitis
Copy link
Member

@deividaspetraitis deividaspetraitis commented Feb 17, 2025

Implements handleCandidateRoutesInGivenOut API for computing exact amount out quotes.

This is smaller chunk of bigger PR-607 ( #607 ) implementing computing exact amount out quotes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced enhanced candidate route selection that now supports flexible routing based on differing input/output conditions.
  • Refactor

    • Updated routing logic for improved clarity and consistency in candidate route retrieval.

Implements `handleCandidateRoutesInGivenOut` API for computing exact
amount out quotes.

This is smaller chunk of bigger PR-607 ( #607 ) implementing computing exact
amount out quotes.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the routing use case implementation by renaming an existing candidate route handling method to explicitly denote that it is for the "out given in" scenario, and by introducing a new method for handling candidate routes in the "in given out" context. Method signatures, calls, and accompanying comments have been updated accordingly, while the underlying caching and persistence logic remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
router/usecase/router_usecase.go - Renamed handleCandidateRoutes to handleCandidateRoutesOutGivenIn with updated signature
- Added new method handleCandidateRoutesInGivenOut
- Updated method calls and comments for clarity

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant RouterUseCase

    Client->>RouterUseCase: Request candidate routes (with tokenIn)
    RouterUseCase->>RouterUseCase: Execute handleCandidateRoutesOutGivenIn
    RouterUseCase-->>Client: Return candidate routes (out given in)

    Client->>RouterUseCase: Request candidate routes (with tokenOut)
    RouterUseCase->>RouterUseCase: Execute handleCandidateRoutesInGivenOut
    RouterUseCase-->>Client: Return candidate routes (in given out)
Loading

Poem

Hoppin' through the lines of code so bright,
I tweak the routes from morning to night.
With "out given in" and "in given out" in play,
My digital burrow shines in a new way.
🐰 From a rabbit's mind, let's hop and debug away!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
router/usecase/router_usecase.go (1)

717-765: Remove nolint:unused once the method is used.

The new method implementation looks good and mirrors the structure of the "out given in" method while appropriately handling "in given out" scenarios. However, the nolint:unused directive suggests this method is not yet used. Please remove this directive once the method is integrated into the codebase.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b8bc4ba and 72775c7.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • router/usecase/export_test.go is excluded by !**/*_test.go
  • router/usecase/router_usecase_test.go is excluded by !**/*_test.go
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • router/usecase/router_usecase.go (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Run linter
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
router/usecase/router_usecase.go (2)

368-368: LGTM! Method name is now more descriptive.

The rename from handleCandidateRoutes to handleCandidateRoutesOutGivenIn makes the method's purpose clearer by explicitly indicating it handles the "out given in" scenario.


667-674: LGTM! Method name and documentation updated.

The method's name and documentation have been updated to clearly indicate its purpose in handling "out given in" scenarios.

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
5.2% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant