Skip to content

Regularized syntax #649

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Sep 7, 2024
Merged

Regularized syntax #649

merged 18 commits into from
Sep 7, 2024

Conversation

reid-spencer
Copy link
Contributor

  • Only allow brief and description values inside the block of their definition.
  • Use "with" clause on leaf definitions for the "descriptives".
  • Fix all test cases as a consequence

reidspencer added 9 commits August 29, 2024 09:18
* No more brief & description after a definition
* They must appear within the definition
* LeafDefinitions and other elements with no children may have
  a "with" clause of "Descriptives" (comment, term, brief, description)
This change compiles but doesn't test
* Bug was a parenting mistake
* Move PrettifyCommand to commands module
* Move PrettifyPass & etc. to passes module
* Adjust the build.sbt to remove prettify module
* Tests don't pass
* opt for a consolidated syntax
* every definition of any type can be followed
  by `with { /* descriptives */ }`
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 7, 2024

@reid-spencer reid-spencer merged commit 8a1aafe into main Sep 7, 2024
4 checks passed
@reid-spencer reid-spencer deleted the regularized-syntax branch September 7, 2024 12:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant