-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Fix benchmarking for pallet-assets::set_reserves() #10711
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
/cmd prdoc --audience runtime_dev --bump minor |
…time_dev --bump minor'
|
/cmd bench --runtime asset-hub-westend --pallet pallet-assets |
|
Command "bench --runtime asset-hub-westend --pallet pallet-assets" has started 🚀 See logs here |
|
Command "bench --runtime asset-hub-westend --pallet pallet-assets" has failed ❌! See logs here |
|
/cmd bench --runtime asset-hub-westend --pallet pallet_assets |
|
Command "bench --runtime asset-hub-westend --pallet pallet_assets" has started 🚀 See logs here |
…t-hub-westend --pallet pallet_assets'
|
Command "bench --runtime asset-hub-westend --pallet pallet_assets" has finished ✅ See logs here DetailsSubweight results:
Command output:✅ Successful benchmarks of runtimes/pallets: |
shawntabrizi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code changes look good to me, seems the weight files are not updated yet
Parametrize pallet-assets::set_reserves() weight based on number of reserves provided instead of always assuming worst-case.