clinic: list audit logs as included in diag #21129
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
missing-translation-status
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @dveeden, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello! Gemini here, ready to give you a quick rundown of this pull request. Based on the title and the changes, the main goal of this PR is to update the documentation for the diagnostic data collection tool (likely tiup diag collect) to explicitly mention that audit logs (tidb-audit.log.json) are included when collecting logs using the --include=log flag. This clarifies the scope of the log collection for users and future reference.
Highlights
- Documentation Update: The primary change is an update to the documentation file
clinic/clinic-data-instruction-for-tiup.md. - Audit Logs Listed: A new entry is added to the table listing collectible diagnostic data, specifically documenting the
tidb-audit.log.jsonfile under the 'Log' category, indicating it's collected with--include=log.
Changelog
- clinic/clinic-data-instruction-for-tiup.md
- Added a row to the diagnostic data table to list 'Audit Logs' (
tidb-audit.log.json) and confirm they are collected with the--include=logflag. - The new row is inserted between the 'Slow log' and 'Configuration file' entries in the table.
- Added a row to the diagnostic data table to list 'Audit Logs' (
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively adds "Audit Logs" to the list of diagnostic data collected by Diag in the clinic-data-instruction-for-tiup.md file. The change is clear, accurate, and correctly formatted.
The review focused on adherence to the provided Documentation Review Style Guide. The changes align well with its principles. Specifically, the use of backticks for the filename and command option (Style Guide, line 34) has been correctly applied in the new table row.
Overall, excellent work on this documentation update!
Summary of Findings
- Documentation Quality and Style Guide Adherence: The added information regarding Audit Logs is clear, accurate, and adheres to the prescribed documentation style guide (specifically, line 34 regarding backtick usage for code elements). This enhances the overall quality and consistency of the document.
Merge Readiness
The changes in this pull request are well-implemented and improve the completeness of the diagnostic data documentation. From a content and style perspective, the PR appears ready for merging. As an AI assistant, I am not authorized to approve pull requests. Please ensure any other necessary human reviews are completed before merging.
| @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ This section lists the types of diagnostic data that can be collected by [Diag]( | |||
| | Log | `tidb.log` | `--include=log` | | |||
| | Error log | `tidb_stderr.log` | `--include=log` | | |||
| | Slow log | `tidb_slow_query.log` | `--include=log` | | |||
| | Audit Logs | `tidb-audit.log.json` | `--include=log` | | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on adding "Audit Logs" to the diagnostic data table! The information is presented clearly, and the formatting is spot on. The use of backticks for the filename tidb-audit.log.json and the option --include=log correctly follows the style guide's recommendation for code elements. 1
Style Guide References
Footnotes
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?