Skip to content

Conversation

@ekexium
Copy link
Member

@ekexium ekexium commented Nov 7, 2025

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #64008

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Validate coprocessor ranges for mutual exclusiveness and monotonicity.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: ekexium <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Nov 7, 2025
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign buchuitoudegou for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked labels Nov 7, 2025
@ekexium
Copy link
Member Author

ekexium commented Nov 7, 2025

/test all

Signed-off-by: ekexium <[email protected]>
@tiprow
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ekexium: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
fast_test_tiprow f2c61cf link true /test fast_test_tiprow

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ekexium: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/check_dev f2c61cf link true /test check-dev
pull-unit-test-next-gen f2c61cf link true /test pull-unit-test-next-gen
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/unit-test f2c61cf link true /test unit-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Diagnosability enhacement for TiDB X

1 participant