-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
*: fix incorrect rlike when quering information_schema (#64301) #64365
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: release-8.5
Are you sure you want to change the base?
*: fix incorrect rlike when quering information_schema (#64301) #64365
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
|
@wjhuang2016 This PR has conflicts, I have hold it. |
|
@ti-chi-bot: ## If you want to know how to resolve it, please read the guide in TiDB Dev Guide. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
Signed-off-by: wjhuang2016 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: wjhuang2016 <[email protected]>
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-8.5 #64365 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 73.7008%
================================================
Files ? 1652
Lines ? 455753
Branches ? 0
================================================
Hits ? 335894
Misses ? 97818
Partials ? 22041
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/unhold |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hawkingrei The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
This is an automated cherry-pick of #64301
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #64249
Problem Summary:
We process rlike as like, so it can't get the right result.
What changed and how does it work?
Use correct regexp.Regexp instead of WildcardPattern. The later is only work for
like.Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.