Skip to content

Update lint rules, force testify/assert for tests #69

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Sean-Der
Copy link
Member

Use testify's assert package instead of the standard library's testing package.

Description

Reference issue

Fixes #...

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.39%. Comparing base (f627aed) to head (651ff3d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #69   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.39%   70.39%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines        1692     1692           
=======================================
  Hits         1191     1191           
  Misses        475      475           
  Partials       26       26           
Flag Coverage Δ
go 70.39% <ø> (ø)
wasm 69.03% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Use testify's assert package instead of the standard library's testing
package.
@Sean-Der Sean-Der merged commit 85cb049 into master Apr 22, 2025
15 checks passed
@Sean-Der Sean-Der deleted the testify branch April 22, 2025 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants