Add methods for exposing internal state#150
Open
jwerle wants to merge 1 commit intoplurals:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
2 tasks
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi @blakeembrey,
I hope you are doing well. This pull request introduces 4 methods on the
pluralizefunction that expose the internal state of this module. The intended purpose of this methods could be for introspection on how this module may handle a word given to it. Consider the wordaudioas an example. The plural form of this word is alsoaudio. However, there are accepted uses of the alternative plural form of this word:audios. While this may not be heard or spoken often for English speakers, it could become common in computer speak, like resource naming in APIs. I hope this makes sense