Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: cluster configuration validation for bool type #777

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

Ygnas
Copy link
Contributor

@Ygnas Ygnas commented Dec 4, 2024

Issue link

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-11022

What changes have been made

Fixed cluster configuration validation for bool types, and changed so all type mismatches are reported simultaneously, rather than stopping at the first occurrence.

Verification steps

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • Testing is not required for this change

@Ygnas Ygnas requested review from KPostOffice, Bobbins228 and ChristianZaccaria and removed request for dimakis and Fiona-Waters December 4, 2024 13:56
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.07%. Comparing base (e666e0a) to head (92ab6e4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #777      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.04%   93.07%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        2402     2410       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         2235     2243       +8     
  Misses        167      167              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ChristianZaccaria ChristianZaccaria left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small nitpick, but looks good! I'll give it a test tomorrow.

As bool is a subtype of int, True/False was considered as 1/0
Copy link
Contributor

@Bobbins228 Bobbins228 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested it out and works great
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@KPostOffice KPostOffice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: KPostOffice

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 5, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit be9763a into project-codeflare:main Dec 5, 2024
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants