Spelling

[jsoref]

This PR corrects misspellings identified by the check-spelling action.

The misspellings have been reported at https://github.com/jsoref/contour/actions/runs/11628797911#summary-32384590478

The action reports that the changes in this PR would make it happy: https://github.com/jsoref/contour/actions/runs/11628798577#summary-32384592098

[github-actions]

Hi @jsoref! Welcome to our community and thank you for opening your first Pull Request. Someone will review it soon. Thank you for committing to making Contour better. You can also join us on our mailing list and in our channel in the Kubernetes Slack Workspace

[jsoref]

As noted in Slack, I'm a human, and I manually selected the corrections. That means I can make mistakes. I didn't spot any for this PR while composing this review, but that doesn't mean there aren't any (I did spot one yesterday for a similar PR that I made elsewhere -- I picked the wrong correction for schame).

I compose changes in a word-family/correction per commit which means if you object to a correction, I can easily drop it (e.g. into, or preexisting). Changes are generally done using tooling for some flavor of search-and-replace (although sometimes they're purely manual). I use VS Code and test w/ CI to try to ensure that I haven't broken tests (the tests here required tags which I didn't have initially, so I had to borrow a tag...). I try to ensure that I don't break whitespace (review shows that in at least one place I adjusted whitespace -- I'm not sure if that was me or VS Code, I think it was me being careful to ensure the replacement included a space).

It's possible for me to split by directory or file extension, but I generally try to discourage that, and while it's occasionally possible for me to split by "comment" vs "code", I wouldn't be able to do that for this repository this year.

[jsoref]

brand

[jsoref]

It's hard to pick the proper article, but there can be only one...

[jsoref]

there are many possible ways to abbreviate context, but this short form dominates this repository (and happens to be my preference)

[jsoref]

It's certainly fine to drop this, but a good tool/human will be able to properly parse this as:

Test SDS Should Not Publish Invalid Secret

Just as they should be able to properly parse HTTPProxy as HTTP Proxy (as long as it's properly spelled...) or TestUpstreamTLSWithHTTPRoute...

[jsoref]

Afaict, this was not an acronym...

[jsoref]

I should call out that I don't have the 1.31 doc fixes here because I branched before that. If you're doing a running review, hopefully you're telling github which changes you've seen so that I can add in the changes for 1.31 at some point. My preference is to amend things into the corresponding commits, but I'm happy to do w/ unsquashed "fixup" commits (and not force-push) if that helps reviewers...

The way I tend to do catch ups is to rebase the spell-check + spelling branches onto a fetched upstream and repeat the workflow until I get back to 0 errors (but I do it in a separate repository to avoid people seeing until I'm ready)...

[jsoref]

As noted earlier for a similar documentation item, this typo only appears in docs and there's nothing to indicate it's intentional.

[jsoref]

this is a style change -- the only consumer in this repository is also changed.
it's possible for someone to include this css file in an external consumer (as it's technically a public resource, and thus it's techncially an api change), but, they really shouldn't, ...

[jsoref]

this is the corresponding consumer

[jsoref]

while this seems fairly innocuous, it's the kind of change that should be scrutinized the most.
thankfully, # will properly ignore 's and thus I believe it's harmless (but you shoukd never trust a random PR submitter).

[sunjayBhatia]

Rather than have this as a one-off, sounds like this is a suggestion to use the https://github.com/marketplace/actions/check-spelling action rather than codespell?

If you want to swap that action out or fix the codespell configuration to catch these errors we would be open to that change

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.04%. Comparing base (e5a25e2) to head (072495f).
Report is 31 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6747      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.76%   81.04%   -0.73%     
==========================================
  Files         133      133              
  Lines       15944    20001    +4057     
==========================================
+ Hits        13037    16210    +3173     
- Misses       2614     3498     +884     
  Partials      293      293              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
internal/annotation/annotations.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
internal/contour/cond.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
internal/dag/accessors.go	87.55% <ø> (-0.15%)	⬇️
internal/dag/gatewayapi_processor.go	94.65% <ø> (+0.77%)	⬆️
internal/dag/policy.go	95.67% <ø> (+0.12%)	⬆️
internal/envoy/v3/cluster.go	96.47% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
internal/provisioner/controller/gatewayclass.go	71.00% <100.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
...nternal/provisioner/objects/dataplane/dataplane.go	85.74% <100.00%> (-1.90%)	⬇️
internal/provisioner/objects/object.go	82.50% <ø> (-1.38%)	⬇️
internal/sorter/sorter.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 3 more

... and 114 files with indirect coverage changes