Conversation
|
Performance benchmarks:
|
tpike3
approved these changes
May 17, 2025
Member
tpike3
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is great @Holzhauer, this has needed improving for awhile!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
For models with required parameters, providing a user input in
model_params(passed toSolarViz()) still raises aValueError: Missing required model parameter. Passinguser_paramsinstead offixed_paramsto_check_model_paramsresolves the issue.Bug / Issue
Because model params are only checked for
fixed_params, user adjusted parameters are not considered and mistakenly considered as missing.Implementation
user_paramsinstead offixed_paramsto_check_model_paramsuser_paramsas return fromsplit_model_paramstouser_adjust_paramsTesting
see tests/test_solara_viz.py::test_model_creator()