-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release/0.6.0 #164
Release/0.6.0 #164
Conversation
- Added `utils.predict_xs` | ||
|
||
### Changed | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to mention the dependency updates too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I waffled on that, so if you thought of it then I suppose we should
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added the updated dependencies. I tried to list the ones that I thought an end user would have to care about, instead of all the ones that were changed; let me know if you think that's a bad decision
Added the fixing of the boolean column bug to the Python section Fleshed out updated dependencies in the Python section. I tried to only list the dependencies that would be relevant to a user
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks Good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGMT!
Offloading the uncertainty discussion to the book is a good call. And good catch on the version number in the citation file. I changed the version in so many places but there was still more!
Changes for the release branch
I tried to make the uncertainty change look more like a "Changelog" entry, but I'm not sure I captured it well. If there's something to pay attention to that would be it.