Skip to content

fix spelling error from codespell #406

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
woodruffw merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2026
+3 −3
Merged

fix spelling error from codespell #406

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions cachecontrol/controller.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -128,12 +128,12 @@ def parse_cache_control(self, headers: Mapping[str, str]) -> dict[str, int | Non
except IndexError:
if required:
logger.debug(
"Missing value for cache-control " "directive: %s",
"Missing value for cache-control directive: %s",
directive,
)
except ValueError:
logger.debug(
"Invalid value for cache-control directive " "%s, must be %s",
"Invalid value for cache-control directive %s, must be %s",
directive,
typ.__name__,
)
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion tests/test_adapter.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ def test_do_not_leak_response(self, url, sess):
resp.raise_for_status()
r1_weak = weakref.ref(resp.raw)

# This is a mis-use of requests, becase we should either consume
# This is a mis-use of requests, because we should either consume
# the body, or call .close().
# But requests without cachecontrol handle this anyway, because
# urllib3.response.HTTPResponse has a __del__ finalizer on it that closes it
Expand Down