Skip to content

Walking reconstruction example #54

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 28, 2025
Merged

Walking reconstruction example #54

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 28, 2025

Conversation

EveCharbie
Copy link
Collaborator

@EveCharbie EveCharbie commented Feb 14, 2025

This change is Reviewable

Copy link

@codeclimate codeclimate bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR diff size of 106451 lines exceeds the maximum allowed for the inline comments feature.

@EveCharbie EveCharbie changed the title [HELP WANTED] Walking reconstruction example Walking reconstruction example Feb 20, 2025
@EveCharbie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Ipuch : My bad, we fixed my environment problem together. So this was already OK and reviewed.

@Ipuch
Copy link
Collaborator

Ipuch commented Feb 24, 2025

@EveCharbie can you try to merge all vtp in one folder ? To avoid duplication of .vtp files ? make sure my msk example still work.

@EveCharbie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Could you please explain a bit more ?
Do you mean folder or file ?
I kind of like that the files are the "same" as OpenSim, that way it is easy for users to go from osim to biomod ( #BioBuddy ;) )

@Ipuch
Copy link
Collaborator

Ipuch commented Feb 25, 2025

I mean I have a folder for meshes for my upper limb example. Some of the vtp files are the same. To avoid the redundancy we could merge the folders and reduce the size of the Pr/repo git history.

I also means your pr needs a force-push.

@EveCharbie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't understand since I already put my vtp files in your folder examples/biorbd/models/Geometry_cleaned.
The only redundancy I see is for the left/right sides: e.g., I have humerus_rv.vtp + humerus_lv.vtp and you have humerus.vtp.
But since humerus.vtp and humerus_rv.vtp are not the same size, I cannot tell if they are the same.
Could you maybe do it for me since we do not seem to understand each other by text ?

@Ipuch
Copy link
Collaborator

Ipuch commented Feb 27, 2025

okay for the redundancy. The first part of your last answer, made it clearer that files are not the same for your example and mine.

Still, there are three pbs:
image

  • The index_proximal_rvs vtp has an offset
  • The spine (hat_spine.vtp) has an offset
  • The thorax(hat_ribs_scap.vtp) has not been well converted to a proper triangle mesh

Do you have these problems locally too ?

Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Feb 28, 2025

Code Climate has analyzed commit 44ca9cd and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

@EveCharbie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Unfortunately, those are problems related to osim_to_biomod :(
I have removed the vtp that had an offset (so that the problem is not noticeable, but it is not fixed).
For the vtp that was not cleaned properly, I think we will have to accept it as is for now. And when I manage to clean it correctly, I will make another small PR.

@Ipuch Ipuch merged commit 75f3280 into pyomeca:main Feb 28, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
@Ipuch Ipuch mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants