Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit #2608

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SebastianAment
Copy link
Contributor

@SebastianAment SebastianAment commented Nov 1, 2024

Summary: This commit adds the implementation of the Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit models and algorithms of the NeurIPS 2024 article.

Differential Revision: D65343571

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Nov 1, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65343571

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.11670% with 69 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 99.60%. Comparing base (3ca48d0) to head (e6386c6).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
botorch/models/relevance_pursuit.py 78.38% 67 Missing ⚠️
botorch/models/likelihoods/sparse_outlier_noise.py 98.43% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2608      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.98%   99.60%   -0.39%     
==========================================
  Files         196      198       +2     
  Lines       17372    17866     +494     
==========================================
+ Hits        17370    17795     +425     
- Misses          2       71      +69     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2608

This commit adds the implementation of the [Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.24222) models and algorithms of the NeurIPS 2024 article.

Differential Revision: D65343571
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65343571

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65343571

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2608

This commit adds the implementation of the [Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.24222) models and algorithms of the NeurIPS 2024 article.

Differential Revision: D65343571
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65343571

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2608

This commit adds the implementation of the [Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.24222) models and algorithms of the NeurIPS 2024 article.

Differential Revision: D65343571
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2608

This commit adds the implementation of the [Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.24222) models and algorithms of the NeurIPS 2024 article.

Differential Revision: D65343571
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65343571

@jduerholt
Copy link
Contributor

I just read the paper, and really like it! We will definitely integrate it into our workflows, as this problem is very common for our experimental data. Currently we are sometimes using iterative trimming.

Any plan when this will land in main?

@SebastianAment
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great to hear @jduerholt! I'll just need to get test coverage to 100%, will try to get the time for this within the next two weeks. Would be curious to learn about your experience if / when you start using the model.

@jduerholt
Copy link
Contributor

jduerholt commented Nov 8, 2024

I will update you, as soon as it will land here in main, I will integrate it into our workflows ;) And then update you on our experience.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants