-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 526
Handle custom_ops like any other ET lib in Android and examples/models/lla{m,v}a/CMakeLists.txt #8946
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Handle custom_ops like any other ET lib in Android and examples/models/lla{m,v}a/CMakeLists.txt #8946
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d0b11e8
Update
swolchok 9437be1
Update
swolchok 643e10e
Update
swolchok 6f2842b
Update
swolchok 231ebc3
Update
swolchok 296513c
Update
swolchok a92958a
Update
swolchok 3fa99d6
Update
swolchok 3bd6437
Update
swolchok 675f01b
Update
swolchok 9fdebee
Update
swolchok 70a7096
Update
swolchok f388177
Update
swolchok 7347915
Update
swolchok a1aeae7
Update
swolchok b478275
Update
swolchok File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wondering how high we can bump this and if we can raise it globally
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as I said on Discord:
so, i'm going to make this change in this PR but not roll it out to the top-level ExecuTorch CMakeLists.txt.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is that the only way to achieve whole-archive? I dont know much on the implication of requiring this but I suppose non-trivial number of folks using et may come to use for llama
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we pip install latest cmake anyway. people who follow our directions will get 3.31.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be good if we can do a codemod to change all CMakeLists.txt to have the same requirement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@larryliu0820 I wouldn't mind doing this, I just thought it might be beneficial to only increase the requirement for the llama example use cases that need this stuff and leave the core/embedded cases lower. What do you think?