Skip to content

Update KJT stride calculation logic to be based off of inverse_indices for VBE KJTs. #2949

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jd7-tr
Copy link
Contributor

@jd7-tr jd7-tr commented May 6, 2025

Summary:
Update the _maybe_compute_stride_kjt logic to calculate stride based off of inverse_indices for VBE KJTs.

Currently, stride of VBE KJT with stride_per_key_per_rank is calculated as the max "stride per key". This is different from the batch size of the EBC output KeyedTensor which is based off of inverse_indices. This causes issues in IR module serialization: debug doc.

Differential Revision: D74273083

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 6, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74273083

jd7-tr added a commit to jd7-tr/torchrec that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
…s for VBE KJTs. (pytorch#2949)

Summary:

Update the `_maybe_compute_stride_kjt` logic to calculate stride based off of `inverse_indices` for VBE KJTs.

Currently, stride of VBE KJT with `stride_per_key_per_rank` is calculated as the max "stride per key". This is different from the batch size of the EBC output KeyedTensor which is based off of inverse_indices. This causes issues in IR module serialization: debug doc.

Differential Revision: D74273083
…s for VBE KJTs. (pytorch#2949)

Summary:

Update the `_maybe_compute_stride_kjt` logic to calculate stride based off of `inverse_indices` for VBE KJTs.

Currently, stride of VBE KJT with `stride_per_key_per_rank` is calculated as the max "stride per key". This is different from the batch size of the EBC output KeyedTensor which is based off of inverse_indices. This causes issues in IR module serialization: debug doc.

Differential Revision: D74273083
@jd7-tr jd7-tr force-pushed the export-D74273083 branch from b9ebfbb to 3304438 Compare May 7, 2025 00:29
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74273083

jd7-tr added a commit to jd7-tr/torchrec that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
…s for VBE KJTs. (pytorch#2949)

Summary:

Update the `_maybe_compute_stride_kjt` logic to calculate stride based off of `inverse_indices` for VBE KJTs.

Currently, stride of VBE KJT with `stride_per_key_per_rank` is calculated as the max "stride per key". This is different from the batch size of the EBC output KeyedTensor which is based off of inverse_indices. This causes issues in IR module serialization: debug doc.

Differential Revision: D74273083
jd7-tr added a commit to jd7-tr/torchrec that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
…s for VBE KJTs. (pytorch#2949)

Summary:

Update the `_maybe_compute_stride_kjt` logic to calculate stride based off of `inverse_indices` for VBE KJTs.

Currently, stride of VBE KJT with `stride_per_key_per_rank` is calculated as the max "stride per key". This is different from the batch size of the EBC output KeyedTensor which is based off of inverse_indices. This causes issues in IR module serialization: debug doc.

Differential Revision: D74273083
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants