Investigate coherence between MPS-based simulators #28
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AlbertoBaiardi
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Verify coherence between the in-house implementation of the MPS evaluator and the
qiskit_aer-based oneDetails and comments
For a fixed (even small bond dimension), the
qiskit_aersimulator and our MPS-based evaluator should give the same accuracy. This PR checks if this is the case, and adds the corresponding tests.Version updated
Please increment the
qaoa_training_pipeline_versionvariable and extend the main README.md.quimbandqiskit_aer