Search results

Migration/Probing (was: Use of "data packet")

editorial

no-action-needed

Status: Open.

#586 In quicwg/multipath;

· gloinul opened on Jul 3, 2025

Uncoordinated abandonment of paths

needs-discussion

Status: Open.

#558 In quicwg/multipath;

· martinthomson opened on May 12, 2025

Missing PATH_ABANDON codes

design

needs-discussion

Status: Open.

#557 In quicwg/multipath;

· martinthomson opened on May 12, 2025

3 PTO requirement for PATH_ABANDON

editorial

no-action-needed

Status: Open.

#556 In quicwg/multipath;

· martinthomson opened on May 12, 2025

Why isn't NEW_TOKEN path-specific?

design

needs-discussion

Status: Open.

#550 In quicwg/multipath;

· martinthomson opened on May 11, 2025

How will MPQUIC support the scenario where the client connects with a dual-stack server via both IPv4 and IPv6 paths?

separate draft

Status: Open.

#327 In quicwg/multipath;

· yangfurong opened on Apr 3, 2024

Proposal: PATH_SETUP frame

separate draft

Status: Open.

#180 In quicwg/multipath;

· michael-eriksson opened on Feb 24, 2023

Inband priority exchange for stream/path scheduler

separate draft

Status: Open.

#92 In quicwg/multipath;

· markusa opened on Jan 20, 2022

Stream-level and flow-level controls

separate draft

Status: Open.

#86 In quicwg/multipath;

· obonaventure opened on Jan 11, 2022

Do we need ack frequency control per path?

separate draft

Status: Open.

#77 In quicwg/multipath;

· yfmascgy opened on Nov 6, 2021

Should servers be allowed to open new paths?

design

separate draft

Status: Open.

#47 In quicwg/multipath;

· mirjak opened on Oct 25, 2021

Take Hardware Offloads into Account

design

no-action-needed

Status: Open.

#25 In quicwg/multipath;

· nibanks opened on Oct 18, 2021