Fixed no current event loop error when using current uvloop version#202
Open
jimyu-baxenergy wants to merge 1 commit intoqwj:masterfrom
Open
Fixed no current event loop error when using current uvloop version#202jimyu-baxenergy wants to merge 1 commit intoqwj:masterfrom
jimyu-baxenergy wants to merge 1 commit intoqwj:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Nice! Also ran into this issue! Could be convenient to have a flag to force disable uvloop in the future? |
eriksw
added a commit
to retailnext/pproxy
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2025
* Downgrade uvloop to 0.21.0
The current (0.22.1) version of uvloop is not supported by pproxy.
A fix is available but has not yet been merged:
qwj/python-proxy#202
* Add an end-to-end validation test to verify that pproxy works.
The `ChildProcess` and `fetch_via_http_proxy` helpers were written using
Copilot.
Signed-off-by: Erik Swanson <erik@retailnext.net>
eriksw
added a commit
to retailnext/pproxy
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2025
* Downgrade uvloop to 0.21.0
The current (0.22.1) version of uvloop is not supported by pproxy.
A fix is available but has not yet been merged:
qwj/python-proxy#202
* Add an end-to-end validation test to verify that pproxy works.
The `ChildProcess` and `fetch_via_http_proxy` helpers were written using
Copilot.
Signed-off-by: Erik Swanson <erik@retailnext.net>
eriksw
added a commit
to retailnext/pproxy
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
Unblock failing dependency updates by avoiding uvloop upgrades until pproxy is updated to support new versions of pproxy. See: qwj/python-proxy#202 Signed-off-by: Erik Swanson <erik@retailnext.net>
eriksw
added a commit
to retailnext/pproxy
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
Unblock failing dependency updates by avoiding uvloop upgrades until pproxy is updated to support new versions of pproxy. See: qwj/python-proxy#202 Signed-off-by: Erik Swanson <erik@retailnext.net>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We found that that using the current version of uvloop with accelerated pproxy now results in the following error.
This PR fixes this error by explicitly creating a new event loop in server.py when uvloop is able to be imported and using the regular event loop otherwise.