Skip to content

Automated Resyntax fixes #506

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Automated Resyntax fixes #506

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

resyntax-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented May 21, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 7 files.

  • Fixed 3 occurrences of or-hash-ref-set!-to-hash-ref!
  • Fixed 3 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of read-line-any
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of map-to-for
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of unless-expression-in-for-loop-to-unless-keyword
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of for-each-to-for
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of if-begin-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of single-clause-match-to-match-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of provide-deduplication

resyntax-ci bot added 10 commits May 21, 2025 00:15
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This expression can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `hash-ref!` expression.
Specify a line mode of `'any` with `read-line` to avoid differences between Windows and other platforms.
Use the `#:unless` keyword instead of `unless` to reduce loop body indentation.
Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
This `for-each` operation can be replaced with a `for` loop.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
This `match` expression can be simplified using `match-define`.
Providing the same identifier multiple times is unnecessary.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants