Skip to content

Use robust descriptive stats for non-parametric arrays; Add ransacking post hoc analysis #464

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 25 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

turkalpmd
Copy link
Contributor

…/333)

I never thought we would be delayed by almost 5–6 months. I had to adapt to a new country — I’m sorry.

#333 (comment)

@turkalpmd turkalpmd force-pushed the turkalpmd branch 2 times, most recently from 9623c21 to 21e8dc6 Compare April 7, 2025 03:03
@turkalpmd
Copy link
Contributor Author

I cant fix this error. I cant understand, because it is already succesfully passed in my local.

@raphaelvallat raphaelvallat changed the title #333 Look PR comments (https://github.com/raphaelvallat/pingouin/pull… Use robust descriptive stats for non-parametric arrays; Add ransacking post hoc analysis Apr 9, 2025
@raphaelvallat
Copy link
Owner

@turkalpmd can you please limit the scope of this PR to the improvements of the non-parametric pairwise T-tests, and remove the Ransacking post-hoc analysis (which should be implemented in a separate PR)? Thanks

@turkalpmd
Copy link
Contributor Author

As you suggested, I’ve now created separate PRs for each branch.
Here is the Ransacking method: #465
I think this is clearly passed to everything. Now we should fix this PR, I can't understand why I couldn't pass this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants