-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 902
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable RLE boolean encoding for v2 Parquet files #13886
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 8 commits into
rapidsai:branch-23.10
from
etseidl:feature/enable_rle_bool
Aug 17, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8755214
enable rle boolean encoding for v2
etseidl beef4b6
add consts
etseidl c7a03ae
remove parens per review comment
etseidl dcaae9e
implement some suggested docstring cleanup
etseidl 8143f2d
Merge branch 'branch-23.10' into feature/enable_rle_bool
etseidl 87856da
add const for rle length field length per review suggestion
etseidl ca1322e
squash more magic numbers and properly account for rle length in frag…
etseidl 26402ff
Merge branch 'rapidsai:branch-23.10' into feature/enable_rle_bool
etseidl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is such adjustment only needed for bool RLE?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So RLE is only used for 1) rep/def levels, 2) dictionary indexes, and 3) booleans. So booleans are the only data type that will be RLE encoded...everything else will be plain or dictionary (or eventually delta).
There's actually a table in the spec that lists when a length is prepended and when it is not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I get it, thanks.
And this is something that does not make sense to include in fragment size?
I'm asking because this "max RLE page size" is implemented as a util function in the ORC writer, so this manual padding looked odd in comparison.
BTW, must be nice not having RLE in almost every data type (cries in ORC).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, because it's just once per page, not every fragment. although, yeah, maybe it should be included in the calculation at line 451. I'll ponder that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, I think that fixed it. nice catch! That would have been a lot of fun tracking down later :P