provider: fix issue in cluster resource quota

[rchikatw]

• Creating a resource of cluster resource quota on the client side does not limit storage usage for the default namespace by default.
• Typically, application users do not have access to the default namespace; however, if an application admin attempts to create a Persistent Volume Claim (PVC) in the default namespace, the quota does not restrict this action.
• BZ for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318045

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rchikatw
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign nbalacha for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[rchikatw]

@nb-ohad @leelavg please review

[leelavg]

@rchikatw pls expand on description as it says what was happening but doesn't mention what this PR does to fix that?

The PR seems to be trying to not track consumption in namespace with name "default", shouldn't the fix for the BZ be an addition in documentation that PVC's in "default" namespace isn't counted towards quota calculations? Internally, an explanation why this can't be done in "default" namespace be added to BZ, wdyt?

[rchikatw]

/hold