Skip to content

feat: Add package processing script and packages template for RHEL 9.0, add RHEL9.0 template as well #150

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

Smejky338
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Smejky338 Smejky338 force-pushed the add-package-processing-script-and-more-packages branch from 6de65fa to ba188e1 Compare April 22, 2025 10:29
@shubham-html-css-js
Copy link
Contributor

hi @Smejky338 , i can see some gitleaks failure, but probably it is due to finding a package name having suffix key in it?

@Smejky338
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey Shubham, thanks for looking at my MR. Yeah all the finds are false positives, I've tried to overcome the issues by adding the .gitleaksignore to disable gitleaks check for that file but it doesn't seem to take that into account and checks & fails it anyways.


This is just a standalone helper script to help you process `dnf repoquery` into a generator-friendly structure for packages.

Before using this, run `dnf repoquery --available --show-duplicates` on your desired machine/VM to get a list of all packages that could be installed on your mahcine.
Copy link
Contributor

@jhutar jhutar Apr 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dnf repoquery --available --queryformat="%{name} %{epoch} %{version} %{release} %{arch} \n" might be easier to process (dnf on my Fedora does not support --show-duplicates so have not tried that, but it is still important).

Copy link
Contributor

@jhutar jhutar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@jhutar
Copy link
Contributor

jhutar commented Apr 22, 2025

Hmm, looks like gitleaks check is still failing

@jhutar
Copy link
Contributor

jhutar commented Apr 22, 2025

Let's merge this for now.

@jhutar jhutar merged commit 47f6074 into main Apr 22, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants