-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: draft new 2023 AUP #11
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few bits that need changing or further looking into.
Acceptable Usage Policy.md
Outdated
|
||
To report any of the above activity, contact us at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]). | ||
Protected characteristics: age; caste; color; disability; ethnicity; family responsibilities; gender; gender identity; housing status; national origin; race; refugee or immigration status; religious affiliation; serious illness; sex; sexual orientation; socioeconomic class and status; source of income; status as a victim of domestic violence, sexual violence, or stalking; and weight and size |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be changed to "Protected characteristics include:" to better cover edge cases. This line should also end with a period.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's best to have a clear definition here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think mabey more specific terms for example that users should not ban or mock someone just for being autistic etc. and discourage people using terms such as guilt trip, not everything is about you etc?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would be nice if there was personal political views in Protected characteristics - it would be nice to have it since people can hate someone because of their view. alto it would be nice to somehow make nazi "ideology" to be banned as well since well yk lol
Co-authored-by: Sophie L <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sophie L <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sophie L <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sophie L <[email protected]>
Things that are still missing based on open issues & just a cursory glance through what other platforms also control:
I think all of these are covered by law anyways, but it'd be good to include them. Discord also has a more explicit list of protections against themselves such as:
Oh also, we should probably include off-platform behaviour when dealing with certain types of reports. |
Actually credit to Discord for going above and beyond on both explicitly tackling misgendering / deadnaming & transparency (see further down):
The 3rd article points to the source:
Which points to https://discord.com/safety-policies, which looks like a genuinely excellent resource, apparently this has been up since late October but isn't promoted anywhere(?). Also, TIL Meta already has these sorts of policies:
Edit: reading through the outrage on Reddit, tldr common complaints are:
NB. this is already covered under the hateful conduct policy proposed but we could look into having in-depth policy information for all of our rules like Discord. |
Also I have redrafted the AUP into a different format, click here to go straight to it (still writing it / then needs proof-reading). |
Hello, I feel like most social media outlets especially discord don't have clear rules to protect autistic users this has lead to people feeling like they can troll and belittle autistic users without punishment. IV drafeted an idea on updating the terms to prevent this it's not perfect but I feel with a bit of editing it can help. __Ablisim And Inclusion Please reframe from I gauging in discrimination of users based solely on if they have autism or depression. This includes the following
|
This feels better suited as a server level ruleset to me - I imagine some of these would be very contentious as platform level rules (for example, the bit about talking about personal issues - not all communities are equipped to deal with these sorts of conversations), and I'd say the bit about discriminating against autistic people is already covered by our discrimination/hate speech policies |
I feel like social media needs to protect autistic users more especially end to end chat applications as in my personal experience it seems like people feel like they are entitled to exclude and mock people who are depressed have autism etc. Every application has rules regarding harassment, discrimination, hate speech etc however it never includes autistic users. Along with race, identity, spiritual beliefs etc being protected shouldn't autistic users be included in this? |
Our hate speech policies already cover disabilities - this in turn covers autism |
I completely understand that the terms cover hate speech harassment etc, however Discord also covers this yet ignores ablisim reports we could mabey have a section or blog post educating people on autism? |
That sounds like an issue you need to take up with Discord, our policies already cover this case, and any violation of it you can report. |
I wanted to choose revolt.chat because they listen to feedback discord doesn't, I don't understand why I'm the only one who sees ablisim as a terms issue for all social networks and apps? |
The issue that you've brought up is already covered by our policies, and is enforced as such when we receive reports of misconduct. Discord not acting upon such reports on their platform is entirely unrelated to us. If you've encountered such behaviour, please report it using the in-app reporting options, or by emailing [email protected] . |
The report function did nothing i notified moderators in the chat but it was ignored. I have multiple tickets about this issue. I genuinly feel it would benifit social media companies to incourage users to be inclusive to those on the specturm. If most people feel comfortable on the app that would help grow the user base even more |
I may be misremembering, but your tickets didn't mention any unactionable reports until your latest. It's very hard to action them as it seems you didn't submit any formal reports at the time and you have since deleted your account. We want to improve the experience for everyone but you haven't been able to offer any suggestions for how we can be more accommodating. Unless you have specific, actionable, suggestions I don't think it's worth taking this conversation further. Talk to server admins and ask them to improve their rules if you see it necessary, and know that our policies already cover most of your concerns. |
I find it very interesting that society is very quick to accomidate people of the LGBTQ community as they should and that's a very good thing, yet when people with autism, depression etc inquire about accommodation were met with the same lines "victum", "snowflake", "not everything's about you" etc. I'm not saying this is the case here I'm thankful that the team has allowed this conversation and listened to these concerns. While I fully understand this is a complex issue and that there are terms regarding harassment bullying etc. Iv seen these terms unfortunately backfire on nearly all social networks that's why I firmly believe all networks can benifit from accommodating autistic users as best as they can. In terms of free speech concerns I don't believe in censorship and I believe everyone is entitled to say and post whatever they like, however belittling people and excluding people for speaking about personal issues should not be tolerated online. I hope you understand I do apologise for taking up alot of space I felt like this idea needed to be discussed as I feel this is a very important social issue. |
@therealdylansteele You continue to insinuate that Revolt is not doing enough to tackle these issues. Could you please outline exactly what action you would like us to take? From Revolt's point of view everything necessary is covered as well as it can be. |
I feel like a blog post or section near the terms of service just reminding people to be more understanding of those with autism, depression etc. I understand that the terms covers alot of this however people online feel like they are entitled to ban or make fun of autistic users therefore unfortunately it has to be made clearer to the user base. This applies to all social networks not just revolt.chat |
Hate speech is already touched on in our current policies and is further covered in our upcoming ones. We already action reports on it. It's already made very clear on the platform that harassment isn't tolerated. Unless you have any further suggestions, I think discussion has come to an end. |
Understood I'll tap out of this thread because I feel like Iv gotton too worked up about the suituation which I do apoligize for. The admin team has my email address from my tickets. If anyone has any questions or concerns feel free to use that or my github email on my profile. |
Updated option. @insertish Last updated: 16. July, 2024 Acceptable Usage PolicyThis Acceptable Usage Policy (AUP) applies to the official instance of Revolt available at revolt.chat. Self-hosted instances may choose to adopt this AUP if they wish. Community GuidelinesRevolt can cater to your community, raid guild, study group, and anything in-between. We encourage you to:
Online communities have the potential to change people's lives, so we want to encourage a positive environment for anyone willing to join. Keeping You SafeTo ensure users stay safe on the platform, we explicitly disallow:
This includes any content that pushes people to cut or injure themselves; that embraces eating disorders such as anorexia or bulimia; or that encourages people to commit suicide as opposed to referring them to the correct treatment and help. If you notice someone in need of urgent help, please contact your local authorities.
Keeping It FairTo ensure users have equal opportunity to use the service and are not taken advantage of, we disallow:
Reporting ViolationsTo report any of the above activity, please use the in-app reporting system. If you cannot use the in-app reporting system for any reason, please contact us at [email protected]. Strikes and SuspensionsViolations of this AUP, or other platform terms, may result in strikes against your account. Strikes are irreversible. Account suspensions can be removed through a successful appeal, but only if you believe that we took the wrong action. There is no point asking to be appealed for breaking the law. If you wish to appeal a suspension, please contact [email protected]. Off-Platform BehaviorIn certain cases, we may take action based on off-platform behaviour, particularly when it involves severe violations of our policies or legal issues. JurisdictionWe abide by laws within the following jurisdictions:
|
Superseded by #13 (suggestions merged) |
The goal of this PR is to explicitly declare all (or at least as much as we can think of) content which is unacceptable on the platform to eliminate any source of confusion.
Some changes for reading clarity are also included.
So far I've only explicitly added hate speech and I stole the protected characteristics list from Discord, it's a pretty good exhaustive list but I don't think we can just lift it 1:1, though I don't see why we should omit anything from the list either?
Closes #11
Closes #5