Skip to content

chore: Use condition from the meta package and clarify the status #799

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

pavolloffay
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@pavolloffay pavolloffay requested a review from a team as a code owner July 3, 2025 09:51
@pavolloffay pavolloffay requested review from danielmellado and jgbernalp and removed request for a team July 3, 2025 09:51
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from alanconway and marioferh July 3, 2025 09:52
// +optional
Tempo string `json:"tempo,omitempty"`

// Conditions provide status information about the instance.
// +listType=atomic
// +optional
Conditions []StatusConditions `json:"conditions,omitempty"`
Conditions []metav1.Condition `json:"conditions,omitempty"`
}

type StatusConditions struct {
Copy link
Collaborator

@jan--f jan--f Jul 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The StatusCondition field can be deleted now I suppose?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Copy link
Contributor

@alanconway alanconway left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alanconway, pavolloffay

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Jul 3, 2025
@jan--f
Copy link
Collaborator

jan--f commented Jul 4, 2025

/hold
Just to avoid an early merge.

@pavolloffay pavolloffay force-pushed the cluster-observability branch from fd44f02 to edd13e0 Compare July 4, 2025 11:29
@pavolloffay pavolloffay force-pushed the cluster-observability-review-comments branch from ea38a65 to 186aba4 Compare July 4, 2025 11:32
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Jul 4, 2025
@pavolloffay pavolloffay force-pushed the cluster-observability-review-comments branch from 186aba4 to 1084f14 Compare July 4, 2025 11:36
@pavolloffay pavolloffay force-pushed the cluster-observability-review-comments branch from 1084f14 to 4b6bfa0 Compare July 4, 2025 11:43
@jan--f
Copy link
Collaborator

jan--f commented Jul 4, 2025

/lgtm
/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Jul 4, 2025
@jan--f jan--f merged commit b6b7e41 into rhobs:cluster-observability Jul 4, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants