-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvement #58
Improvement #58
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
src/srvgrp-performance.adoc
Outdated
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ specific performance domain and performance service. | |||
! `DOMAIN_ID` is invalid. | |||
|
|||
! RPMI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED | |||
! Fast-channel not implemented. | |||
! Fast-channel not is implemented. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fast-channel is not implemented, previous was also alright
src/transport.adoc
Outdated
a RISC-V privilege level a application processors and a platform | ||
microcontroller. A application processors can have multiple RPMI transport | ||
An RPMI transport instance provides bi-directional communication channels | ||
between a RISC-V privilege-level application processor and a platform |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
between a RISC-V privilege-level of a application processor
src/transport.adoc
Outdated
microcontroller. A application processors can have multiple RPMI transport | ||
An RPMI transport instance provides bi-directional communication channels | ||
between a RISC-V privilege-level application processor and a platform | ||
microcontroller. An application processors can have multiple RPMI transport |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An application processor
src/transport.adoc
Outdated
Fast channels are shared memory based transport required for use cases | ||
that require lower latency and faster processing of commands. A Fast channel | ||
=== Fast-channels | ||
Fast-channels are shared memory based transport required for use cases |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After reading this again, i think we should remove the word "transport" from this. May lead to more questions since this is not a RPMI transport as per RPMI. We can write something like-
"Fast-channels are shared memory based channel per application processor required for use cases .... ....."
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
- Fix EventID to 1 byte - Fix typo and grammar - Update description for RPMI_ERR_DENIED Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
- Update description for RPMI_ERR_DENIED - Remove RPMI_ERR_DENIED error for DPWR_GET_STATE. Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
Event ID is only one byte. Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <[email protected]>
No description provided.