Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

R-Ladies Bioconductor collaboration post draft #340

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jananiravi
Copy link
Member

@jananiravi jananiravi requested a review from a team as a code owner July 21, 2024 14:28
@jananiravi jananiravi requested a review from drmowinckels July 21, 2024 14:28
Copy link
Member

@yabellini yabellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if we agree on this text here to be published, but the big issue here is that Bioconductor already posted.

I dislike that Bioconductor, which has people paid to work for them, is imposing its agenda on a completely 100% volunteer organization like R-Ladies.

Even if we agree on the text, they shouldn't publish it before us.

I have some questions and some change requests.

@jananiravi
Copy link
Member Author

I don't know if we agree on this text here to be published, but the big issue here is that Bioconductor already posted.

I dislike that Bioconductor, which has people paid to work for them, is imposing its agenda on a completely 100% volunteer organization like R-Ladies.

Even if we agree on the text, they should publish it before us.

I have some questions and some requests for change.

Sorry you feel this way, Yani. Bioconductor is not pushing anything on to R-Ladies. Shannon (on behalf of RL) and folks from the Bioconductor community advisory board have been adding suggestions to the doc, and we have been going back and forth. We got through a few changes and discussions on the doc and finalized a few days ago.

Since the BioC conference is this week (as I had mentioned), we were trying to finalize once @shannonpileggi approved all the comments and she gave an OK for a PR (via slack). I misunderstood and thought that the RLadies leadership team approved it for publishing. Since the Bioconductor community manager (@mblue9) is traveling internationally to bioc, she posted it yesterday. No other reason than that. If there is any concern, I can ask bioconductor to retract and repost. I didn't think there was any concern based on the conversation.

Once again, I apologize for any confusion on my part. We meant to get your feedback and thoughts (which I thought we did). We only moved forward following that. It makes sense to have links from both -- and I requested feedback on that, too. Happy to change whatever needs to be changed. Let us know what you all think.

@yabellini
Copy link
Member

@shannonpileggi is a member of the R-Ladies Leadership, so she can approve a blog post, and I support her decision. She took charge of this matter to move forward, and I am very grateful for that.

I still think that both organizations should publish the blog post simultaneously, and we should agree on how to spread the word about it.

I understand the urgency of the timing of the conference, but this agreement was not just for this particular conference.
In any case, I am giving my opinion here because my review was requested in this PR.

@shannonpileggi
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for the confusion I introduced! @jananiravi what I did not communicate clearly is that we view a PR as a way for others to chime in and give feedback prior to publishing; not that a PR submission is approval of the final piece. Sorry for not being clear.

@rladies rladies deleted a comment from anthonypileggi Jul 22, 2024
@jananiravi
Copy link
Member Author

Not a problem, Shannon. I didn't mean to rush or complicate anything, either. I just misunderstood -- should have asked to clarify (I was too preoccupied to notice). I am also looping in @mblue9 (Maria Doyle) so we are on the same page. I'm glad we cleared the air because I don't want to start what might be amazing for both organizations on the wrong foot. Thanks for understanding. For now, we can edit the post here and revise the Bioconductor post, too. I shared our handles on the platforms. We can retract and repost those, too, as needed. [I will take a look at this tomorrow after my proposal deadline.]

@mblue9
Copy link

mblue9 commented Jul 22, 2024

Hi all,

I apologise for the confusion caused by the premature posting of the blog. We misunderstood and thought it was approved. I’ll work on making the necessary edits to both the blog post and the working group description to ensure they align with R-Ladies' feedback.

I've opened PRs to incorporate the feedback:

Blog post PR: Bioconductor/biocblog#66
Working group page PR: Bioconductor/BiocWorkingGroups#45

Thanks for your understanding, and I look forward to working with you further.

jananiravi and others added 2 commits July 25, 2024 14:16
Co-authored-by: Yanina Bellini Saibene <[email protected]>
Hi, I added a few suggested changes based on @yabellini and @shannonpileggi -- hope this language is a bit clearer?
cc: @mblue9
Copy link
Member

@yabellini yabellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Finally, I found the time to go through this blog post. I made some suggestions for change.

jananiravi and others added 11 commits October 14, 2024 08:48
@mblue9, I've added a few minor changes. Let me know if it's good to go. We can wait for the R-Ladies orgs' final read-through to move towards publishing. Thanks a ton, everyone!
This announcement formalizes this spontaneous collaboration between the two communities.
Here are a few concrete ways in which we want to get the ball rolling:

- Announce each others' events on websites and social media.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Announce each others' events on websites and social media.
- Share and promote events of mutual interest.

suggesting this change to keep it flexible.

- Jointly host events about bioinformatics/computational biology with local R-Ladies Chapters, benefiting both parties.
- Promote R-Ladies local watch parties of live-casted or pre-recorded events and professional networking events for Bioconductor conferences (using content from BioC: BioC North America, BioCAsia, EuroBioC).
- Highlight Bioconductor speakers at R + computational biology R-Ladies events across chapters; similarly, highlight R-Ladies, who are interested in computational biology and developing Bioconductor packages, at BioC events.
- Do you have a new idea of collaboration for R-Ladies and Bioconductor that you don't see here? Please reach out to us!
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Do you have a new idea of collaboration for R-Ladies and Bioconductor that you don't see here? Please reach out to us!
- Have a new idea for collaboration between R-Ladies and Bioconductor that you dont see here? Please reach out to us!

@jananiravi
Copy link
Member Author

Appreciate these quick changes, @mblue9. @shannonpileggi @yabellini et al., please let us know if these most recent changes look good to you and what's the appropriate plan/timeline to proceed with the blog post -- we can synchronize our release dates based on feasibility from both sides. Thanks again!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants