Skip to content

Add a unified aggregate endpoint #28

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

roanutil
Copy link
Owner

feature/make-internal-aggregate-endpoint-public

feature/make-internal-aggregate-endpoint-public
feature/make-internal-aggregate-endpoint-public
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.34%. Comparing base (8b3f49e) to head (06df31f).
Report is 18 commits behind head on 3.0-preview.

Files Patch % Lines
...eDataRepository/CoreDataRepository+Aggregate.swift 0.00% 15 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           3.0-preview      #28      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        83.87%   83.34%   -0.54%     
===============================================
  Files               34       35       +1     
  Lines             2822     2834      +12     
===============================================
- Hits              2367     2362       -5     
- Misses             455      472      +17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@r-jarvis r-jarvis merged commit 742aa43 into 3.0-preview Jul 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@roanutil roanutil deleted the feature/make-internal-aggregate-endpoint-public branch July 18, 2024 21:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants