Merged
Conversation
maelle
requested review from
a team and
yabellini
and removed request for
a team and
yabellini
mpadge
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2025
Member
mpadge
left a comment
mpadge
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have no idea what the babeldown config actually does, so given that ... 😏 ... looks great, thanks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
for ropensci-review-tools/babeldown#90 and #813
I did a rountrip with tinkr on those files because I noticed discrepancies when I run the
deepl_branch_update()function in a test PR: there was the actual edit due to translation, plus a ton of formatting edits.