Fix ResizeNode to allow remapping both image and camera_info topics #693
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Due to how
image_transport::create_camera_subscription
creates acamera_info
topic from the provided image topic name, the current implementation ofimage_proc::ResizeNode
ends up using the same topic name/camera_info
for both the input image subscriber and the output resized image publisher. This prevents remapping the input and output CameraInfo topics.This change makes
image
andresize
topic namespaces instead of image topic names, which allows the node to correctly separately use/image/camera_info
and/resize/camera_info
.