Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: refactor code and add validation for values #3971

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

fix: refactor code and add validation for values #3971

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

ItsSudip
Copy link
Member

@ItsSudip ItsSudip commented Jan 9, 2025

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

We are refactoring the code to allocate all the logic related to identifier in one place. We also added a validation to check if provided value is greater than 0 or not. As we are mapping that to transaction_amount_micros after multiplying with 1,000,000 and it can't be less than 1000 as per the doc.

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-3085 INT-3020

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@ItsSudip ItsSudip requested review from a team and sivashanmukh as code owners January 9, 2025 03:37
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Allure Test reports for this run are available at:

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.75%. Comparing base (495343b) to head (215ce66).
Report is 16 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3971      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    90.76%   90.75%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          624      622       -2     
  Lines        32546    32520      -26     
  Branches      7723     7718       -5     
===========================================
- Hits         29540    29515      -25     
+ Misses        2750     2749       -1     
  Partials       256      256              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Allure Test reports for this run are available at:

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Allure Test reports for this run are available at:

@ItsSudip ItsSudip merged commit fc09080 into develop Jan 20, 2025
27 checks passed
@ItsSudip ItsSudip deleted the fix.gaoc branch January 20, 2025 04:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants