expectRevert causing early failure when cheatcodes are called before the reverting call#1109
Closed
expectRevert causing early failure when cheatcodes are called before the reverting call#1109
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Closing as duplicate of #1012. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When using
vm.expectRevert()with cheatcodes likevm.addr()ormakeAddr(), Kontrol would incorrectly trigger the revert check on the cheatcode call, leading to tests failing with EVMC_REVERT instead of waiting for the actual reverting call.For example, in cases where a function is invoked after an
expectRevert, the test would fail prematurely because of thevm.addr()call that causes the#checkRevertmechanism to intervene on the successfulvm.addr()call.The root cause was the
foundry.set.expectrevertrules inserting#checkRevertfor every opcode call, including cheatcodes, contrary to Foundry’s specification.OTOH, the overly aggressive
cheatcode.call.ignoreCallsrule prevented proper execution and return values of cheatcodes.The solution involved removing the
cheatcode.call.ignoreCallsrule to allow normal execution of cheatcodes and adding guards to thefoundry.set.expectrevertrules to skip adding the#checkRevertfor calls to the FoundryCheatCode contract address (vm).This ensures that cheatcodes execute normally during
expectRevert, only actual contract calls are monitored, and tests remain consistent with Foundry behavior.