Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Exclude draft PRs from triage dashboard #1248

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Exclude draft PRs from triage dashboard #1248

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/triage.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ pub async fn pulls(
}

let mut pulls: Vec<Value> = Vec::new();
for base_pull in base_pulls.into_iter() {
for base_pull in base_pulls.into_iter().filter(|pull| !pull.draft) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of excluding draft PRs, it might be a better idea to just mark them in gray. WG-triage doesn't triage draft waiting-on-review and waiting-on-author PRs, though it seems we do triage draft blocked PRs. T-clippy might triage draft PRs as well.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, I think it would make sense to triage them after some time to close them out (basically draft is similar to waiting-on-author I think, in fact I might say that we should just treat it equivalently)...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, I think it would make sense to triage them after some time to close them out

Yeah, they probably should continue to be included.

basically draft is similar to waiting-on-author I think, in fact I might say that we should just treat it equivalently

I wouldn't say they're equivalent, in fact I would say most of the time they are different. For many PRs, waiting-on-author means "the author needs to address reviewer comments or fix conflicts". On the other hand, draft means "this is only partially implemented".

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 for hiding or indicating as a draft, I'd like to have an option to hide draft (and even S-blocked) since we don't have to check them frequently and rust-lang/rust's triage queue is quite long. I think something like this would be a good way here (this just hides PRs but we can tweak attributes, e.g., change the color): https://github.com/JohnTitor/triagebot/tree/hide-drafts

let assignee = base_pull.assignee.map_or("".to_string(), |v| v.login);
let updated_at = base_pull
.updated_at
Expand Down