Skip to content

chore: remove unused score factor file #71

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2025

Conversation

naim-ea
Copy link
Collaborator

@naim-ea naim-ea commented Jul 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved reliability when filtering contributors to prevent errors if the contributor list is missing.
  • Chores

    • Removed an obsolete configuration file related to scoring factors.

@naim-ea naim-ea requested a review from dtczelo July 30, 2025 07:18
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 30, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
gnolove ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 30, 2025 7:19am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Walkthrough

This change deletes the score-factors.json file, which previously defined several scoring constants, and updates the contributor filtering logic in best-performing-teams.tsx to safely handle potentially undefined or null contributor arrays by defaulting to an empty array before filtering.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Score Factors File Removal
score-factors.json
Deleted the JSON file containing scoring factor constants for commits, issues, PRs, and reviews.
Contributor Filtering Logic
src/components/features/scoreboard/best-performing-teams.tsx
Updated contributor filtering to always operate on an array, preventing runtime errors.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: add discord bot #62: Adds the score-factors.json file and related server-side handling, directly related as it manages the same scoring factor definitions affected by this PR.

Poem

A file of factors hops away,
No more scores to weigh or play.
Contributors now filtered right,
Arrays ensured, no bugs in sight.
With every hop, the code grows clean—
A rabbit's joy, serene and keen! 🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9856fd2 and bf1d10b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • score-factors.json (0 hunks)
  • src/components/features/scoreboard/best-performing-teams.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • score-factors.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/features/scoreboard/best-performing-teams.tsx (1)

31-31: LGTM! Good defensive programming practice.

This change improves null safety by ensuring .filter() is always called on an array. The previous optional chaining approach (contributors?.filter) would return undefined when contributors is null/undefined, whereas the nullish coalescing operator (contributors ?? []) provides a safe fallback to an empty array.

This pattern is consistent with similar implementations elsewhere in the codebase, such as in scoreboard.tsx (line 56).

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/remove-unused-score-factor-file

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dtczelo dtczelo self-requested a review July 30, 2025 17:12
@naim-ea naim-ea merged commit 3b7f9c4 into main Jul 30, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants