-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
feat: assign last file name as _SASPROGRAMFILE #641
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2 questions. First is why? I can guess, but would like your reasoning. The second is wouldn't just assigning this to sas_code_text at line 66 be simpler?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In our team, we use different IDEs (EG, Studio, enhence editor & batch) with differenct connection methods. The settup file should detected the path to workspace from the filename.
The reasone that I didn't put it in the
sas_code_txtis it may be annoising to end SAS user as it is not in their code but will in the log.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I were to suggest you simply put that statement into the
in you're sascfg_personal.py Configuration Definition, would that solve this issue four your team? This seems awfully specific to something you're doing which isn't something everyone who ever uses this run_saspy.py script would want. Putting it your config would make it work for any way you ever use saspy, not only from this script. It would work with any python script you use as well and from any UI or anything. Obviously, you'd add
import os.pathbefore it in your sascfg_personal.py file so that it resolves.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like we can't get
sas_fnameinautoexec.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand. There's no difference between submitting that string of sas code in it's own sas.submit() after the SASsession has been established, or prepending it to other code that you submit, or having me submit it for you, during session start up, prior to you being able to submit the rest of what you like.
Perhaps you can provide something showing what you're really trying to do or what problem you're facing. I see no difference with just having it in the 'autoexec' key of the Configuration Definition, compared to what you have here; other than everyone else who ever uses this having that line of code submitted in their sessions for no particular reason.
Can you expand?
Thanks,
Tom