BB-694: Update auth config schema#2659
Conversation
Hello tmacro,My role is to assist you with the merge of this Available options
Available commands
Status report is not available. |
1b5e9f3 to
34a1825
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## development/9.0 #2659 +/- ##
===================================================
+ Coverage 73.34% 73.39% +0.04%
===================================================
Files 201 201
Lines 13387 13393 +6
===================================================
+ Hits 9819 9830 +11
+ Misses 3558 3553 -5
Partials 10 10
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Request integration branchesWaiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user. To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command: Alternatively, the |
|
/create_integration_branches |
Waiting for approvalThe following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:
The following options are set: create_integration_branches |
| ssl: joi.boolean(), | ||
| protocol: joi.string(), | ||
| const sslSchema = joi.object({ | ||
| ssl: joi.boolean().default(false), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would having type: "ssl" be more consistent with the other auth types?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The ssl auth isn't really a distinct type, it can be used with kerberos and basic auth as well. My feeling is most deploys using kerberos and basic auth will use at least ca and key so the credentials aren't sent over the wire unencrypted.
d51787a to
4f5c717
Compare
History mismatchMerge commit #7d38f2312d9a31a7851ede0cd3c7cd7a5508f9e2 on the integration branch It is likely due to a rebase of the branch Please use the The following options are set: create_integration_branches |
|
/reset |
Reset completeI have successfully deleted this pull request's integration branches. The following options are set: create_integration_branches |
Waiting for approvalThe following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:
The following options are set: create_integration_branches |
Build failedThe build for commit did not succeed in branch w/9.1/improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches |
In the queueThe changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the The changeset will be merged in:
The following branches will NOT be impacted:
There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once IMPORTANT Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.
If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches |
Queue build failedThe corresponding build for the queue failed:
Remove the pull request from the queue
|
4f5c717 to
ead9d77
Compare
Reset completeI have successfully deleted this pull request's integration branches. The following options are set: create_integration_branches, wait |
Waiting for approvalThe following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:
The following options are set: create_integration_branches |
|
/approve |
|
I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
The following branches have NOT changed:
Please check the status of the associated issue BB-694. Goodbye tmacro. The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches |
Extends the existing schema to support basic auth and stricter checking of kerberos.