Skip to content

BB-694: Update auth config schema#2659

Merged
bert-e merged 2 commits intodevelopment/9.0from
improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema
Jul 21, 2025
Merged

BB-694: Update auth config schema#2659
bert-e merged 2 commits intodevelopment/9.0from
improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema

Conversation

@tmacro
Copy link
Contributor

@tmacro tmacro commented Jul 15, 2025

Extends the existing schema to support basic auth and stricter checking of kerberos.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 15, 2025

Hello tmacro,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@tmacro tmacro force-pushed the improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema branch from 1b5e9f3 to 34a1825 Compare July 15, 2025 15:19
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.39%. Comparing base (2abfc06) to head (ead9d77).
Report is 2 commits behind head on development/9.0.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...nsions/notification/NotificationConfigValidator.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...tensions/notification/destination/KafkaProducer.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
extensions/notification/index.js 75.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Components Coverage Δ
Bucket Notification 76.47% <100.00%> (+1.00%) ⬆️
Core Library 79.67% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
Ingestion 70.14% <ø> (ø)
Lifecycle 77.94% <ø> (ø)
Oplog Populator 85.06% <ø> (ø)
Replication 58.55% <ø> (ø)
Bucket Scanner 85.60% <ø> (ø)
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.0    #2659      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            73.34%   73.39%   +0.04%     
===================================================
  Files                  201      201              
  Lines                13387    13393       +6     
===================================================
+ Hits                  9819     9830      +11     
+ Misses                3558     3553       -5     
  Partials                10       10              
Flag Coverage Δ
api:retry 9.50% <80.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
api:routes 9.32% <80.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
bucket-scanner 85.60% <ø> (ø)
ft_test:queuepopulator 8.94% <80.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
ingestion 12.58% <80.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
lib 7.41% <80.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
lifecycle 18.80% <80.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
notification 1.05% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
replication 18.56% <80.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unit 49.05% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 15, 2025
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 15, 2025

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@tmacro
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmacro commented Jul 15, 2025

/create_integration_branches

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 15, 2025
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 15, 2025

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@tmacro tmacro changed the title BB-695: Update auth config schema BB-694: Update auth config schema Jul 15, 2025
ssl: joi.boolean(),
protocol: joi.string(),
const sslSchema = joi.object({
ssl: joi.boolean().default(false),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would having type: "ssl" be more consistent with the other auth types?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The ssl auth isn't really a distinct type, it can be used with kerberos and basic auth as well. My feeling is most deploys using kerberos and basic auth will use at least ca and key so the credentials aren't sent over the wire unencrypted.

@tmacro tmacro force-pushed the improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema branch from d51787a to 4f5c717 Compare July 18, 2025 20:08
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 18, 2025

History mismatch

Merge commit #7d38f2312d9a31a7851ede0cd3c7cd7a5508f9e2 on the integration branch
w/9.1/improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema is merging a branch which is neither the current
branch improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema nor the development branch
development/9.1.

It is likely due to a rebase of the branch improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema and the
merge is not possible until all related w/* branches are deleted or updated.

Please use the reset command to have me reinitialize these branches.

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@tmacro
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmacro commented Jul 18, 2025

/reset

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 18, 2025

Reset complete

I have successfully deleted this pull request's integration branches.

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 18, 2025
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 18, 2025

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 21, 2025
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 21, 2025

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch w/9.1/improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 21, 2025

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

  • ✔️ development/9.1

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.6

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 21, 2025

Queue build failed

The corresponding build for the queue failed:

  • Checkout the status page.
  • Identify the failing build and review the logs.
  • If no issue is found, re-run the build.
  • If an issue is identified, checkout the steps below to remove
    the pull request from the queue for further analysis and maybe rebase/merge.
Remove the pull request from the queue
  • Add a /wait comment on this pull request.
  • Click on login on the status page.
  • Go into the manage page.
  • Find the option called Rebuild the queue and click on it.
    Bert-E will loop again on all pull requests to put the valid ones
    in the queue again, while skipping the one with the /wait comment.
  • Wait for the new queue to merge, then merge/rebase your pull request
    with the latest changes to then work on a proper fix.
  • Once the issue is fixed, delete the /wait comment and
    follow the usual process to merge the pull request.

@tmacro tmacro force-pushed the improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema branch from 4f5c717 to ead9d77 Compare July 21, 2025 19:53
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 21, 2025

Reset complete

I have successfully deleted this pull request's integration branches.

The following options are set: create_integration_branches, wait

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 21, 2025
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 21, 2025

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@tmacro
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmacro commented Jul 21, 2025

/approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit ead9d77 into development/9.0 Jul 21, 2025
10 checks passed
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jul 21, 2025

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

  • ✔️ development/9.1

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.6

Please check the status of the associated issue BB-694.

Goodbye tmacro.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/BB-694/update_auth_config_schema branch July 21, 2025 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants