Skip to content

Add logic subscription plan v2 ai #839

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ndmanvar
Copy link
Collaborator

@ndmanvar ndmanvar commented Jun 3, 2025

No description provided.

@ndmanvar ndmanvar requested a review from a team as a code owner June 3, 2025 21:06
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 3, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
empower ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 3, 2025 11:09pm

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 3, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.01%. Comparing base (7db16b8) to head (e281e7d).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
flask/src/utils.py 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #839      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   27.86%   28.01%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        1055     1060       +5     
  Branches      115      115              
==========================================
+ Hits          294      297       +3     
- Misses        742      744       +2     
  Partials       19       19              
Flag Coverage Δ
api 7.20% <60.00%> (+0.56%) ⬆️
frontend 44.72% <ø> (ø)
Components Coverage Δ
checkout_module 7.20% <60.00%> (+0.56%) ⬆️
product_component 41.47% <ø> (ø)
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
flask/src/utils.py 60.71% <60.00%> (-0.08%) ⬇️

@rohan-bhaumik
Copy link

@codecov-ai-reviewer review

Copy link

codecov-ai bot commented Jun 6, 2025

On it! We are reviewing the PR and will provide feedback shortly.

Copy link

codecov-ai bot commented Jun 6, 2025

PR Description

This pull request introduces a new utility function, get_subscription_plan, to determine the subscription plan type and defaults to 'annual' if the provided type is not 'monthly'. It also adds a placeholder function get_if_else_result with a TODO comment, intended for future implementation. Unit tests for get_subscription_plan are included.

Click to see more

Key Technical Changes

  1. Added get_subscription_plan function to utils.py that returns 'monthly' if the input is 'monthly', otherwise defaults to 'annual'.
  2. Added get_if_else_result function to utils.py that always returns True.
  3. Added a unit test for get_subscription_plan in test_utils.py to verify its behavior with 'monthly', 'annual', and 'nonexistent_plan' inputs.

Architecture Decisions

The get_subscription_plan function uses a simple if-else statement for determining the subscription plan. The default plan is hardcoded as 'annual'. The get_if_else_result function is a placeholder and doesn't represent any architectural decision yet.

Dependencies and Interactions

The changes are self-contained within the utils.py and test_utils.py files and do not introduce any new dependencies or interact with other parts of the system. The get_subscription_plan function could potentially be used by other modules in the future to determine subscription types.

Risk Considerations

  1. The get_subscription_plan function currently lacks input validation and might not handle unexpected input values gracefully.
  2. The get_if_else_result function is a placeholder and its purpose is unclear, which could lead to confusion or misuse if not properly addressed in the future.
  3. The test cases for get_subscription_plan use assert instead of self.assertEqual, which is not the standard practice for unittest and provides less informative error messages.

Notable Implementation Details

The get_subscription_plan function uses a ternary operator for brevity. The get_if_else_result function is a trivial implementation and requires further development to fulfill its intended purpose. The test cases in test_utils.py could be improved by using standard unittest assertions and adding more comprehensive test coverage.

Comment on lines +34 to +35
def get_subscription_plan(type):
return 'monthly' if type == 'monthly' else 'annual'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider using a more explicit approach with enum or constants for subscription types to improve type safety and maintainability. This would also make it clearer what valid subscription types are supported.

Suggested change
def get_subscription_plan(type):
return 'monthly' if type == 'monthly' else 'annual'
def get_subscription_plan(plan_type):
valid_plans = {'monthly': 'monthly', 'annual': 'annual'}
return valid_plans.get(plan_type, 'annual')

Comment on lines +37 to +42
# TODO
def get_if_else_result():
if True:
return True
else:
return False
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The get_if_else_result() function is trivial and seems to have no real purpose. It always returns True and has a TODO comment without specifics. Consider removing this function or implementing its actual purpose.

Suggested change
# TODO
def get_if_else_result():
if True:
return True
else:
return False
# Remove this function if it's not needed, or implement its actual purpose
# For example:
# def get_if_else_result(condition):
# """Returns result based on a condition."""
# if condition:
# return True
# else:
# return False

Comment on lines +45 to +47
def test_get_subscription_plan(self):
assert get_subscription_plan('monthly') == 'monthly'
assert get_subscription_plan('annual') == 'annual'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use proper unittest assertions rather than plain assert statements. Plain assertions provide less informative error messages when tests fail and don't follow the unittest pattern used in the rest of the test file.

Suggested change
def test_get_subscription_plan(self):
assert get_subscription_plan('monthly') == 'monthly'
assert get_subscription_plan('annual') == 'annual'
def test_get_subscription_plan(self):
self.assertEqual(get_subscription_plan('monthly'), 'monthly')
self.assertEqual(get_subscription_plan('annual'), 'annual')
self.assertEqual(get_subscription_plan('nonexistent_plan'), 'annual')

Comment on lines +34 to +35
def get_subscription_plan(type):
return 'monthly' if type == 'monthly' else 'annual'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The function should ideally validate input types. Consider adding input validation to handle non-string inputs or using type hints.

Suggested change
def get_subscription_plan(type):
return 'monthly' if type == 'monthly' else 'annual'
def get_subscription_plan(plan_type: str) -> str:
"""Determines the subscription plan based on the input type.
Args:
plan_type (str): The type of subscription plan ('monthly' or 'annual')
Returns:
str: The validated subscription plan, defaulting to 'annual' for invalid inputs
"""
if not isinstance(plan_type, str):
return 'annual'
return 'monthly' if plan_type == 'monthly' else 'annual'

Comment on lines +45 to +47
def test_get_subscription_plan(self):
assert get_subscription_plan('monthly') == 'monthly'
assert get_subscription_plan('annual') == 'annual'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding more test cases to ensure the function handles edge cases properly, such as None values, empty strings, or non-string inputs.

Suggested change
def test_get_subscription_plan(self):
assert get_subscription_plan('monthly') == 'monthly'
assert get_subscription_plan('annual') == 'annual'
def test_get_subscription_plan(self):
"""Test the get_subscription_plan function with valid and invalid inputs."""
self.assertEqual(get_subscription_plan('monthly'), 'monthly')
self.assertEqual(get_subscription_plan('annual'), 'annual')
self.assertEqual(get_subscription_plan('nonexistent_plan'), 'annual')
self.assertEqual(get_subscription_plan(''), 'annual')
self.assertEqual(get_subscription_plan(None), 'annual')
self.assertEqual(get_subscription_plan(123), 'annual')

Comment on lines +37 to +42
# TODO
def get_if_else_result():
if True:
return True
else:
return False
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No test has been added for the get_if_else_result() function. Either add tests or remove this function if it's not needed or still under development.

@ndmanvar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ndmanvar commented Jun 6, 2025

@codecov-ai-reviewer test

Copy link

codecov-ai bot commented Jun 6, 2025

On it! Codecov is generating unit tests for this PR.

@codecov-ai codecov-ai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants